5. Expelling people from their communities
A company may face liability if it has gained access to the site on which it operates, where it builds infrastructure, or where it explores for natural resources, through forced displacement.
-
5.1 Lundin - South Sudan
In 2021, two former executives of Swedish oil company Lundin were indicted for aiding and abetting war crimes committed by the government of Sudan during the civil war in the south of the country. The criminal trial of Chairman Ian Lundin and CEO Alexandre Schneiter started in September 2023 and is scheduled to end in 2026.
The Swedish investigation was triggered in 2010 by a report prepared by the Dutch civil society organisation PAX, which documented a link between oil exploration and increasing violence in the war-torn south. The report and subsequent documentation established that between 1997 and 2003, crimes were committed including killings, rape, child abduction, torture, pillage, arson, destruction of schools, markets and clinics were destroyed. An estimated 12,000 people died and 180,000 were forcibly displaced.
At trial, prosecutors have alleged that the defendants provided logistical support to the government of Sudan forces, such as roads and landing strips, and that they closely coordinated security operations to ensure access to oil exploration areas.
Sources:
Trial Reports - the Lundin Case, Civil Rights Defenders
Lundin War Crimes Trial Podcast
Unpaid Debt, PAX, case summaries and resources
Sudan, Oil, and Human Rights, Human Rights Watch, 2003
-
5.2 BNP Paribas - Darfur
In 2020, French authorities launched an investigation into BNP Paris in connection with its alleged role in providing financial services to the government of Sudan. The investigation was launched in response to a complaint filed by victims of crimes committed by the government of Sudan between 2002 - 2008. In 2024, the investigation was reported to be ongoing .
BNP Paribas has declined to comment on the ongoing investigations.
In a 2014 plea deal with US authorities BNP Paribas plead guilty to charges it violated US sanctions by providing financial services to Sudan, Cuba and Iran. Charges in the sanctions case included that BNPP used a system of proxy banks “to process approximately $6.4 billion on behalf of Sudanese sanctioned entities”. As part of the plea deal BNP Paribas admitted the bank had acted for the Sudanese government during the period 2002-2008. BNP Paribas was required to pay a USD $8.9 billion penalty.
In 2024, a US judge ordered a separate law suit to proceed.
The criminal complaint filed in France by victims, with the support of FIDH, alleged that “by providing the Sudanese government with credit facilities, allowing the government to export petrol and access foreign money markets…the bank facilitated the commission of human rights violations amounting to international crimes by the Sudanese government.”(FIDH)
The crime base upon which the complain is based consists of allegations that “the government – through its military and security forces and Janjaweed militias – committed widespread human rights violations amounting to international crimes (including torture, crimes against humanity and genocide) against Sudanese civilians…tens of thousands of Sudanese activists and ordinary civilians were killed, forcibly displaced from their homes, detained, tortured and subjected to inhumane treatment or raped and subjected to other forms of sexual violence.” (FIDH)
Sources
Judicial Investigation Opened into BNP Paribas’ Role in Atrocities in Sudan, FIDH, 11 October 2020
Some useful links…
And some other situations where corporate involvement in international crimes has been alleged
-
There are a number of resources online that will help victims and survivors, business people, investigators, risk managers, journalists, and the interested public unpack the sometimes complex issues related to corporate involvement in international crimes. Check out the resources listed here.
-
There are a range of potential liabilities emerging from business activity in Israel and Palestine. To learn more, read this landmark UN report (June 2025), check out resources like Investigate and Don't Buy Into Occupation and Who Profits and the BDS Movement…
…or drop us a line.
-
There are significant sanctions risk in relation to Ukraine but also the possibility that technology and other value chains supply Russian aggression or launder stolen goods onto global markets. There are also risks connected to the evolving war economy in Ukraine. To start, check out the main boycott campaign B4Ukraine and if you have questions drop us a line.
-
Syria is in the early days of a transition from war, oligarchism, and dictatorship to…something else. For current issues, check out reports of the SLDP to start. If your interested in past investigations or have questions drop us a line.
-
Corporate connections to the Myanmar military junta and the companies it controls create litigation risks. NGOs have brought complaints via National Contact Points and in 2025 a criminal complaint was filed against the telecom giant Telenor alleging the Norwegian company violated sanctions.
This page is under construction
•
Not for citation
•
This page is under construction • Not for citation •